• To: "'Simon St.Laurent'" <simonstl@s...>,<xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: more QName madness
• From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@n...>
• Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 23:32:04 -0000
• Importance: Normal
• In-reply-to: <r01050400-1021-3DEB5B94F76511D69E4A0003937A08C2@[192.168.124.21]>
• Reply-to: <michael.h.kay@n...>

> At what point in all this forward motion did the process go 
> over a cliff?  There were clearly signs at the beginning of 
> the journey, but it is quite remarkable how far this trip has 
> continued since.

Sadly, my prediction that no-one would ever use XML Namespaces because
the whole idea was so unworkable is one of many occasions on which I
have misjudged the collective stupidity of the IT community. What we are
seeing today is the inevitable consequences of an architectural blunder.

Michael Kay
Software AG
home: Michael.H.Kay@n...
work: Michael.Kay@s... 

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: more QName madness
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• References:
  • more QName madness
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XML/RDF
• Next by Date: RE: more QName madness
• Previous by thread: Re: more QName madness
• Next by thread: RE: more QName madness
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread