• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Does WTSIWYG make simplicity moot?
• From: Sean McGrath <sean.mcgrath@p...>
• Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 11:59:36 +0000

[Tony Coates]
 >On the other hand, Authority does things with namespaces in W3C XML 
Schemas that
 >other validators don't accept, and I had to stop people from using it to
 >prettyprint the Schemas I generate for MDDL.  So here is a tool that in one
 >circumstance is a boon, and in another is a source of problems.  There are no
 >silver bullets.

Oh yes there is. Simplicity is the silver bulllet. Simplicity always supports
a text editor interface.

W3C XML Schemas needs pretty GUI tools in order
to manage a complexity that is man made - not ab initio.

McGrath's Conspiracy theory of technology complexity:
         "Any software technology that positively, absolutely needs a GUI is
         probably more complicated than is strictly necessary."

:-)

Sean


http://seanmcgrath.blogspot.com

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Does WTSIWYG make simplicity moot?
    • From: "Anthony B. Coates" <abcoates@T...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Microsoft on XML
• Next by Date: End of the Web browser era? And an opportunity for SVG?
• Previous by thread: RE: Does WTSIWYG make simplicity moot?
• Next by thread: Re: Does WTSIWYG make simplicity moot?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread