• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: is XML complete?
• From: Richard Tobin <richard@c...>
• Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2002 13:46:39 GMT
• Cc:
• In-reply-to: <200211071339.NAA09812@m...>
• Organization: HCRC, University of Edinburgh

>>the WG seems to act like doing a 2.0 is a given. 

Oops, I misinterpreted that as referring to an XML 2.0, but it
really meant XML Schemas 2.0.

-- Richard

• References:
  • Re: is XML complete?
    • From: Richard Tobin <richard@c...>

• Prev by Date: Re: is XML complete?
• Next by Date: how is xpointer supposed to work?
• Previous by thread: Re: is XML complete?
• Next by thread: Re: is XML complete?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread