• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: What are the arguments *for* XHTML 2.0?
• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 12:09:42 -0500
• In-reply-to: <175.1208a29f.2b0bc843@a...>

AndrewWatt2000@a... writes:
>Another formulation might be, "Starting with a clean sheet of paper,
>does it make sense to develop XHTML further?".

I'm afraid I don't find that question meaningful.  

We're not starting with a clean sheet of paper, and starting over in the
existing context seems quite plainly the surest route to accomplishing
nothing at all.

-------------
Simon St.Laurent - SSL is my TLA
http://simonstl.com may be my URI
http://monasticxml.org may be my ascetic URI
urn:oid:1.3.6.1.4.1.6320 is another possibility altogether

• References:
  • Re: What are the arguments *for* XHTML 2.0?
    • From: AndrewWatt2000@a...

• Prev by Date: Re: What are the arguments *for* XHTML 2.0?
• Next by Date: Re: The truth about standards...
• Previous by thread: Re: What are the arguments *for* XHTML 2.0?
• Next by thread: Re: What are the arguments *for* XHTML 2.0?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread