• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Why RDF is hard
• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2002 23:13:12 -0500
• In-reply-to: <3DD8629F.3000600@p...>

paul@p... (Paul Prescod) writes:
>I'm not convinced (yet?) that the world divides in to these neat 
>categories. Do you see this as tricky:

I can keep about ten triples in my head at any given time, and count
myself lucky for that.

I find the form in which you just presented it, complete with URI and
relative URI garbage, far less comprehensible than simple labels which
say what they mean without URIs' syntactic overhead.

-------------
Simon St.Laurent - SSL is my TLA
http://simonstl.com may be my URI
http://monasticxml.org may be my ascetic URI
urn:oid:1.3.6.1.4.1.6320 is another possibility altogether

• References:
  • Re: Why RDF is hard
    • From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>

• Prev by Date: Re: RDF
• Next by Date: Re: HELP PLEASE with links (please dont send blank response)
• Previous by thread: Re: Why RDF is hard
• Next by thread: Re: Why RDF is hard
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread