• To: Joe English <jenglish@f...>
• Subject: Re: Proposed RPV syntax for RDF
• From: Bill de hÓra <bill.dehora@p...>
• Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 15:34:31 +0000
• Cc: XML Dev <xml-dev@l...>
• Organization: Propylon
• References: <3DD092B5.3080308@t...> <200211121523.gACFNG310721@d...>
• Reply-to: bill.dehora@p...
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.1) Gecko/20020826

Joe English wrote:
> Tim Bray wrote:
> 
> 
>>I ran out of patience with RDF/XML and tried to think of a simple
>>alternative; check out http://www.textuality.com/xml/RPV.html -Tim
> 
> 
> Whatever happened to N3?  I thought that was going to be
> the replacement syntax for RDF/XML.

N3 isn't RDF; it's more powerful. The RDF wg invented ntriples for 
writing test cases, which is very like N3 in appearance - but they 
don't recommend it for interchange over RDFXML.

Bill de hÓra

--
Propylon
www.propylon.com

• References:
  • Proposed RPV syntax for RDF
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
  • Re: Proposed RPV syntax for RDF
    • From: Joe English <jenglish@f...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Proposed RPV syntax for RDF
• Next by Date: Re: Does WTSIWYG make simplicity moot? (was Re: dtds, schemas, xhtml, and multimedia technologies)
• Previous by thread: Re: Proposed RPV syntax for RDF
• Next by thread: XML Schema
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread