• To: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• Subject: Re: Proposed RPV syntax for RDF
• From: Bill de hÓra <bill.dehora@p...>
• Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 11:34:44 +0000
• Cc: XML Dev <xml-dev@l...>
• Organization: Propylon
• References: <3DD092B5.3080308@t...>
• Reply-to: bill.dehora@p...
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.1) Gecko/20020826

Tim Bray wrote:
> I ran out of patience with RDF/XML and tried to think of a simple 
> alternative; check out http://www.textuality.com/xml/RPV.html -Tim


  Good stuff - although getting RDF Core to charter a simplified 
syntax (as opposed to an abbreviated one) would be better.

This is about the third or fourth simplified syntax I've come across 
in the last few years. There's surely enough of them now to form the 
basis for a W3 note.

Bill de hÓra
--
Propylon
www.propylon.com

• References:
  • Proposed RPV syntax for RDF
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Does WTSIWYG make simplicity moot? (was Re: dtds, schemas, xhtml, and multimedia technologies)
• Next by Date: Re: Alternate (non-RDF) XML syntax for OWL
• Previous by thread: Proposed RPV syntax for RDF
• Next by thread: Re: Proposed RPV syntax for RDF
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread