Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
elharo@m... (Elliotte Rusty Harold) writes: >Section 7 states "The current draft includes providing support for >the default namespace in the XPointer namespace binding context. This >can be removed, but needs consideration." > >It's not clear what you mean here. Section 7 is the only place I see >the default namespace mentioned or used. Basically it means that I needed to think it through. Other sections state that all of the bindings are added, which to me would include the default namespace, but XPath, as you note, ignores it. >Furthermore, the default namespace does not apply to XPath 1.0 >expressions; e.g. //name selects name elements in no namespace, not >name elements in the default namespace. So even if you can include >the default namespace, it probably won't have any effect. I think that's the simple conclusion that I should add instead of my current "needs consideration" text. ------------- Simon St.Laurent - SSL is my TLA http://simonstl.com may be my URI http://monasticxml.org may be my ascetic URI urn:oid:1.3.6.1.4.1.6320 is another possibility altogether
|
