• To: AndrewWatt2000@a...
• Subject: Re: Documenting XSLT (Was: Note from the Troll)
• From: Adam Turoff <ziggy@p...>
• Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 15:20:56 -0500
• Cc: tblanchard@m..., xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <107.1a53850f.2aeef53b@a...>
• References: <107.1a53850f.2aeef53b@a...>
• User-agent: Mutt/1.4i

On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 03:16:59PM -0500, AndrewWatt2000@a... wrote:
> In a message dated 27/10/2002 11:49:32 GMT Standard Time, tblanchard@m... 
> writes:
> > XSLT files are maintainable with the same level of ease as densely 
> > written perl.  Developers asked to modify them routinely rewrite them 
> > because they can't figure out what the last guy was doing.
> 
> The problem might, at least partly, be attributed to the absence of a 
> documentation element in XSLT 1.0.

<!-- really? -->

Z.

• References:
  • Documenting XSLT (Was: Note from the Troll)
    • From: AndrewWatt2000@a...

• Prev by Date: Re: XInclude: security risk 1
• Next by Date: RE: Documenting XSLT (Was: Note from the Troll)
• Previous by thread: Documenting XSLT (Was: Note from the Troll)
• Next by thread: Re: Documenting XSLT (Was: Note from the Troll)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread