• To: bryan <bry@i...>
• Subject: Re: Future of XSL-FO at W3C??
• From: "m batsis" <mbatsis@n...>
• Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2002 14:20:48 +0300
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• Organization: Netsmart S.A., Greece
• References: <000001c275ca$f8f84920$2001a8c0@bryans>
• Reply-to: mbatsis@n...
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.2a) Gecko/20020910

Bryan,

Thanks for your reply.

bryan wrote:
> 
> m batsis wrote:
>>Instead of 
>>duplicating the semantics of CSS in XML syntax, it should have been 
>>using CSS directly for the same reasons XPath expressions are not 
>>written as XML.
> 
> 
> Definitely, especially as by not having this one loses out on the
> separation of tasks that css has made possible in large web
> developments, not to mention that css provides a more efficient layer
> for the separation of content and presentation than xslt does, which is
> not a slam at xslt. For my XSL-FO work I have re-implemented this
> separation.

Can you share your methodology? I'd be interested to know how you 
seperate and reuse presentation info.

Manos

• References:
  • RE: Future of XSL-FO at W3C??
    • From: "bryan" <bry@i...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Future of XSL-FO at W3C??
• Next by Date: Re: Quick Review of XML 1.1 Candidate Recommendation
• Previous by thread: RE: Future of XSL-FO at W3C??
• Next by thread: Re: Future of XSL-FO at W3C??
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread