• To: <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: The XML 1.1 Candidate Recommendation is published
• From: "Karl Waclawek" <karl@w...>
• Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 10:58:23 -0400
• References: <200210161121.HAA04627@m...> <009701c27517$b07e9ae0$9e539696@citkwaclaww2k> <p04330101b9d327429bb3@[192.168.254.4]>

>It may, however, make sense for generating canonical XML.


> You would think, wouldn't you? However, canonical XML chose not to
> require normalization of preexisting Unicode text. The canonical
> forms of resume' and resumé are different.

There must be a good reason, but what is it?

Karl

• References:
  • Re: The XML 1.1 Candidate Recommendation is published
    • From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
  • Re: The XML 1.1 Candidate Recommendation is published
    • From: "Karl Waclawek" <karl@w...>
  • Re: The XML 1.1 Candidate Recommendation is published
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Separation of Concerns (was Re: The XML 1.1 Candidate Recommendation is published)
• Next by Date: RE: XDocs and XForms?
• Previous by thread: Re: The XML 1.1 Candidate Recommendation is published
• Next by thread: Separation of Concerns (was Re: The XML 1.1 Candidate Recommendation is published)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread