• To: <keith@w...>,<xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: Annotations in XPath-NG? (Re: XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns)
• From: "Keith W. Boone" <keith@w...>
• Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2002 13:54:38 -0400
• Importance: Normal
• In-reply-to: <LEEOLHFCOBHIBMPBAGGCAENLELAA.keith@w...>
• Reply-to: <keith@w...>

FYI:  I still think that an annotation axis is probably the right way to go.
The syntax is preferable over what is required for a function call, and fits
much better with my requirements.  It's just a time thing...

	Keith

Engineering is what happens when science and
mathematics meet politics.  Products are what
happens when all three meet reality.

• References:
  • RE: Annotations in XPath-NG? (Re: XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns)
    • From: "Keith W. Boone" <keith@w...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Annotations in XPath-NG? (Re: XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns)
• Next by Date: Re: Re: Divorcing Data Model and Syntax: was Re: heritage (was Re: SGML on the Web)
• Previous by thread: RE: Annotations in XPath-NG? (Re: XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns)
• Next by thread: Re: Annotations in XPath-NG? (Re: XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread