• To: jeni@j...
• Subject: Re: Re: Divorcing Data Model and Syntax: was Re: heritage (was Re: SGML on the Web)
• From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2002 10:03:53 -0400 (EDT)
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <107944480220.20021007142738@j...> from "Jeni Tennison" at Oct 07, 2002 02:27:38 PM

Jeni Tennison scripsit:

> That's an implementation issue. The LMNL data model is an abstract
> description of a way of looking at textual documents. That abstract
> description is realised in the LOM (an API that is designed to work
> with in-memory representations of the data model), but also in SAL (an
> event-based API).

BTW, I want to urge you to give equal rights to push-based and pull-based
LMNL event APIs.

-- 
John Cowan                              <jcowan@r...>
http://www.ccil.org/~cowan              http://www.reutershealth.com
Unified Gaelic in Cyrillic script!
        http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Celticonlang

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Re: Divorcing Data Model and Syntax: was Re: heritage (was Re: SGML on the Web)
    • From: Jeni Tennison <jeni@j...>

• References:
  • Re: Divorcing Data Model and Syntax: was Re: heritage (was Re: SGML on the Web)
    • From: Jeni Tennison <jeni@j...>

• Prev by Date: Re: heritage (was Re: SGML on the Web)
• Next by Date: Re: heritage (was Re: SGML on the Web)
• Previous by thread: Re: Divorcing Data Model and Syntax: was Re: heritage (was Re: SGML on the Web)
• Next by thread: Re: Re: Divorcing Data Model and Syntax: was Re: heritage (was Re: SGML on the Web)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread