• To: Jeni Tennison <jeni@j...>
• Subject: JITTs and DOM
• From: Patrick Durusau <pdurusau@e...>
• Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 09:40:03 -0400
• Cc: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>, "W. E. Perry" <wperry@f...>, LMNL-DEV <lmnl-dev@l...>, Matthew Brook O'Donnell <mtrout@n...>, xml-dev@l...
• References: <200210101305.JAA29379@m...> <19514849372.20021010140724@j...>
• Reply-to: pdurusau@e...
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:0.9.4) Gecko/20011128 Netscape6/6.2.1

Jeni and Friends,

Thought there might be some interest in a very short note I have posted 
to the JITTs page on the impact of the JITTs paradigm on DOM performance.

Jump from the JITTs page, http://www.sbl-site2.org/Extreme2002 or go 
there directly at: http://www.sbl-site2.org/Extreme2002/JITTs_and_DOM.html.

Running on a laptop, gains of 26 to 39 times were observed. (As file 
sizes increases, so do the performance increases.) Note I do not 
characterize these as "tests," merely observations. Further work is needed.

I am on the road and will be in meetings/traveling so will only have 
sporadic email access. Looking forward to seeing other "observations" 
using these well-formed XML test files.

Enjoy!

Patrick

-- 
Patrick Durusau
Director of Research and Development
Society of Biblical Literature
pdurusau@e...

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: JITTs and DOM
    • From: Jeni Tennison <jeni@j...>
  • Re: JITTs and DOM
    • From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Great piece on RSS
• Next by Date: Re: RE: evolvable formats
• Previous by thread: The Parable of the Languages
• Next by thread: Re: JITTs and DOM
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread