• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: limits of the generic
• From: Joe English <jenglish@f...>
• Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2002 08:19:06 -0700
• In-reply-to: <CNEHJIJMDHDIGIPHFEBLOEIJCLAA.james.fuller@o...>
• References: <CNEHJIJMDHDIGIPHFEBLOEIJCLAA.james.fuller@o...>

James Fuller wrote:

> Your best bet is to create an issues overview document which is written for
> the 80%; better yet if written by Jeni Tennison, Michael Kay, and James
> Clark. A shadow TAG cabinet....

Or: if those three (and maybe Uche Ogbuji and a few others)
developed a skunkworks spec for XSLT 2, that would serve end
users far better than the current W3C process.

I know that's asking a lot, but please consider it.


--Joe English
 
  jenglish@f...

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: limits of the generic
    • From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...>
  • Re: limits of the generic
    • From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...>

• References:
  • RE: limits of the generic
    • From: "James Fuller" <james.fuller@o...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns
• Next by Date: Re: XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns
• Previous by thread: Re: XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns
• Next by thread: Re: limits of the generic
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread