• To: "Dave Winer" <dave@u...>,"Bullard, Claude L \(Len\)" <clbullar@i...>,"Mike Champion" <mc@x...>,<xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: Great piece on RSS
• From: "Danny Ayers" <danny666@v...>
• Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 13:42:10 +0200
• Importance: Normal
• In-reply-to: <009701c270b9$09dc5310$33a1dc40@murphy>

 Another way to phrase Mike Champion's
>question, would you be willing to ride in an airplane that had only been
>tested in theoretical conditions? I wouldn't. I'd let someone else be the
>guinea pig. Dave

With all due respect Dave, isn't that exactly what happened with RSS 2.0? It
was released as a fait accompli (save for explanations in 2.01, or however
you put it), although the namespace angle hadn't been tested.

I know Richard Branson made the move from records to aeroplanes, can I just
suggest now that your skills are most appreciated in the software industry
;-)

Cheers,
Danny.

• References:
  • Re: Great piece on RSS
    • From: "Dave Winer" <dave@u...>

• Prev by Date: Re: RE: evolvable formats
• Next by Date: Re: JITTs and DOM
• Previous by thread: Re: Great piece on RSS
• Next by thread: RE: RE: RE: Great piece on RSS
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread