• To: Norman Walsh <ndw@n...>,xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: well-formed Web
• From: Ann Navarro <ann@w...>
• Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2002 15:59:53 -0400
• In-reply-to: <87wup0y6m4.fsf@n...>
• References: <r01050300-1015-7803383AD61E11D6A3790003937A08C2@[192.168.124.21]><r01050300-1015-7803383AD61E11D6A3790003937A08C2@[192.168.124.21]>

At 03:37 PM 10/2/2002 -0400, Norman Walsh wrote:

>No one
>says you must use namespaces. No one says you must use any technology
>you don't want to.

A market may do whatever they want in their own space. But if they're going 
to use nearly any W3C XML technology, they certainly do, since any new W3C 
spec has to be delivered with namespace support.
Very few markets operate in a vacuum, which means nearly everyone is stuck 
using namespaces in one fashion or another.

Ann

-----
Ann Navarro, WebGeek, Inc.
http://www.webgeek.com

say what? http://www.snorf.net/blog

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: well-formed Web
    • From: Norman Walsh <ndw@n...>

• References:
  • well-formed Web
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
  • Re: well-formed Web
    • From: Norman Walsh <ndw@n...>

• Prev by Date: RE: XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns
• Next by Date: Re: well-formed Web
• Previous by thread: Re: well-formed Web
• Next by thread: Re: well-formed Web
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread