[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]


> > Hmmmph.  Well, I proudly put myself on the exact opposite end of this 
> > spectrum.  XML works for me.  I like it, and it has solved many practical 
> > problems for me and my clients.  
> 
> To the house dust mite a flake of dead skin is a sumptuous meal.

I meant to add to my last message (to make it less content-free, even if 
that's not cricket to you):

It's telling that you chose to respond to my post, which contained a lot of 
discussion of my lack of disaffection with XML, with this bit of perhaps 
insolent inscrutability.

And will you ever fix your mail reader to kill all that HTML crap when posting 
to mailing lists?


-- 
Uche Ogbuji                                    Fourthought, Inc.
http://uche.ogbuji.net    http://4Suite.org    http://fourthought.com
Python&XML column: 2. Introducing PyXML - http://www.xml.com/pub/a/2002/09/25/p
y.html
The Past, Present and Future of Web Services 1 - http://www.webservices.org/ind
ex.php/article/articleview/663/1/24/
The Past, Present and Future of Web Services 2 - 'http://www.webservices.org/in
dex.php/article/articleview/679/1/24/
Serenity through markup - http://adtmag.com/article.asp?id=6807
Tip: Using generators for XML processing - http://www-106.ibm.com/developerwork
s/xml/library/x-tipgenr.html



Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member