• To: "Alaric B. Snell" <alaric@a...>
• Subject: Re: The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wa rs!
• From: tblanchard@m...
• Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 13:48:46 +0200
• Cc: "J.Pietschmann" <j3322ptm@y...>, xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <E184Hz6-0001Ex-00@c...>

On Wednesday, October 23, 2002, at 11:39  AM, Alaric B. Snell wrote:
> With Java, as long as you have a Java interface declared, you can at 
> least
> dispense with the stubs by using a Proxy.
>
> The Proxy stuff in Java rocks my world. I used it to define my own 
> RMI-like
> protocol, for example.

Yeah but it breaks Blanchard's law of code generation.  Dynamic proxies 
basically construct classes and load them on the fly by generating code 
to forward interface calls to implementations.  So the system relies on 
code generation (binary code generation in this case) to do its thing.

Which implies that Java isn't really powerful enough to do whats needed 
as it exists today and you're already scraping up against the wall.

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wa rs!
    • From: "Gerben Rampaart \(Casnet Brussel\)" <Gerben@C...>

• References:
  • Re: The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wa rs!
    • From: "Alaric B. Snell" <alaric@a...>

• Prev by Date: RE: R: Comparison between SAX parser
• Next by Date: RE: The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wa rs!
• Previous by thread: Re: The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wa rs!
• Next by thread: RE: The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wa rs!
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread