• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Future of XSL-FO at W3C??
• From: Ian Tindale <iandeli@c...>
• Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2002 15:09:43 +0100
• In-reply-to: <E182XLK-0005UE-00@FUSNWR01-LRS>
• Organization: -
• References: <cb.29d7ce0e.2ae15d39@a...> <200210181408.50095.iandeli@c...> <E182XLK-0005UE-00@FUSNWR01-LRS>
• User-agent: KMail/1.4.2

On Friday 18 October 2002 2:36 pm, Anthony B. Coates wrote:
> Had you forgotten about FO viewers?  

Oops, you're right - I had. Oops, there, done it again. Damn, I can't retain 
this knowledge - FO viewers - seems illogical, captain. What was the first 
one again?

-- 
Ian Tindale

• References:
  • Re: Future of XSL-FO at W3C??
    • From: AndrewWatt2000@a...
  • Re: Future of XSL-FO at W3C??
    • From: Ian Tindale <iandeli@c...>
  • Re: Future of XSL-FO at W3C??
    • From: "Anthony B. Coates" <abcoates@T...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Future of XSL-FO at W3C??
• Next by Date: Re: Future of XSL-FO at W3C??
• Previous by thread: Re: Future of XSL-FO at W3C??
• Next by thread: Re: Future of XSL-FO at W3C??
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread