• To: xmlmaster@h... (Wayne Steele)
• Subject: Re: Questions about XPointer Framework
• From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 14:21:41 -0400 (EDT)
• Cc: gustaf.liljegren@x..., xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <F70OZ4sBIMNBPzalpv600016e90@h...> from "Wayne Steele" at Oct 15, 2002 11:09:14 AM

Wayne Steele scripsit:

> You're right, that is a pretty limiting form of extensibility. Would it make 
> you happier if they left a range of schemes for non-w3c extensions? Maybe 
> Schemes that start with "x-" ?

Don't sweat it.  The next versions will leave lots of room (all but epsilon)
for non-W3C schemes.

-- 
John Cowan          http://www.ccil.org/~cowan        jcowan@r...
To say that Bilbo's breath was taken away is no description at all.  There are
no words left to express his staggerment, since Men changed the language that
they learned of elves in the days when all the world was wonderful. --The Hobbit

• References:
  • Re: Questions about XPointer Framework
    • From: "Wayne Steele" <xmlmaster@h...>

• Prev by Date: RE: XDocs and XForms?
• Next by Date: Re: RE: XDocs and XForms?
• Previous by thread: Re: Questions about XPointer Framework
• Next by thread: RE: XDocs and XForms?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread