• To: "'Bullard, Claude L \(Len\)'" <clbullar@i...>, "'Mike Champion'" <mc@x...>, "'Dave Winer'" <dave@u...>, <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: RE: Great piece on RSS
• From: Bill de hÓra <bill.dehora@p...>
• Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 17:11:23 +0100
• Importance: Normal
• In-reply-to: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EE0DF79F@h...>
• Organization: Propylon
• Reply-to: <bill.dehora@p...>

> From: Bullard, Claude L (Len) [mailto:clbullar@i...] 
>
> What the web says is not the issue.  It is the 
> inference a court makes because that is where 
> the authority to decide will vest given a dispute.

I don't see what marks out UDDI as something around which you'd
cultivate a legal framework, above and beyond other web mediated
systems.

Bill de hÓra 
--
Propylon
www.propylon.com 

 

• References:
  • RE: RE: Great piece on RSS
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>

• Prev by Date: RE: RE: RE: Great piece on RSS
• Next by Date: RE: RE: Great piece on RSS
• Previous by thread: RE: RE: Great piece on RSS
• Next by thread: RE: RE: RE: Great piece on RSS
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread