• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Article on the disadvantages of UDDI?
• From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>
• Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 08:17:46 -0400
• In-reply-to: <3DA5018F.8000505@p...>

10/10/2002 12:26:55 AM, Paul Prescod <paul@p...> wrote:


>
>http://www.blogstream.com/pauls/1034221895/index_html

I agreed with most of it.  I was on a Internet World panel with
a UDDI guru last week, and came away with more appreciation
for it than I had, so I'm doing some rethinking ....

One thing though:
"I haven't heard a clear argument for avoiding the use of 
semantic web technologies to solve a problem that is clearly
within their domain. My current sense is that it is merely a 
case of NIH syndrome."

My current sense is that it's Not Invented Yet syndrome, or
at least Not Proved Yet syndrome.  After all, UDDI 1.0 pre-dated
WSDL, much less any compelling, widely known examples of semantic
web technologies solving practical problems at Internet scale.

[trolling for examples proving me wrong :-) ]

• References:
  • Re: Article on the disadvantages of UDDI?
    • From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>

• Prev by Date: The Parable of the Languages
• Next by Date: Re: Great piece on RSS
• Previous by thread: Re: Article on the disadvantages of UDDI?
• Next by thread: RE: how they really feel about XML
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread