• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Future of XSL-FO at W3C??
• From: Ian Tindale <iandeli@c...>
• Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2002 14:01:45 +0100
• In-reply-to: <200210181301.JAA03401@m...>
• Organization: -
• References: <200210181301.JAA03401@m...>
• User-agent: KMail/1.4.2

On Friday 18 October 2002 1:48 pm, John Cowan wrote:
> Then why not fill up the daily newspapers with "Lorem ipsum", tastefully
> presented?  Much cheaper than having to pay all those pesky journalists.
> (Hmm... perhaps that *is* what's going on.)

Indeed, you might as well. Then when it's looking right, run some real 
editorial through it - then some more, then some more, day after day, etc. As 
far as the template-driven stylesheet aware designer of the future is 
concerned, it might as well be 'Lorem ipsum' and in fact probably should be - 
properly 'tagged' up of course. :-)

-- 
Ian Tindale

• References:
  • Re: Future of XSL-FO at W3C??
    • From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Microsoft and vector graphics (Was:XDocs and XForms?)
• Next by Date: Re: Future of XSL-FO at W3C??
• Previous by thread: Re: Future of XSL-FO at W3C??
• Next by thread: Re: Future of XSL-FO at W3C??
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread