• To: "'dareo@m...'" <dareo@m...>, "'simonstl@s...'" <simonstl@s...>, "'xml-dev@l...'" <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: well-formed Web
• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2002 09:32:18 -0500
• Cc: "'joe@b...'" <joe@b...>

Which of course, isn't true as shown 
by the ease with which Google can be 
gamed.

len

From: Dare Obasanjo [mailto:dareo@m...]

I read it. I'm not sure what you saw that is supposedly particularly
insightful about the piece. The message seems to be "we don't need RDF
to create a semantic web, all we need is Google and XML". I actually
don't see what XML has to do with anything and think the only lucid
point is the same as the original FTrain article; "all we need is Google
to create the semantic web." 

• Prev by Date: RE: XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns
• Next by Date: RE: RE: xsd validation was RE: XPath/XSLT 2.0 con cerns
• Previous by thread: RE: well-formed Web
• Next by thread: Re: "Datatypes" for DTDs
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread