• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Article: "The horror of XML"
• From: Richard Tobin <richard@c...>
• Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 15:23:03 GMT
• Cc:
• In-reply-to: <p04330100b9e6d3d3f8a1@[192.168.254.4]>
• Organization: HCRC, University of Edinburgh

>It's the infoset's fault that it doesn't mandate simple 
>well-formedness.

It's true that it could have done that.

But if spec writers want it, they can always require an infoset
corresponding to a well-formed XML document.

If there was demand for it, the Infoset could be amended to include
a definition of a "well-formed infoset", or something like that.

-- Richard

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Article: "The horror of XML"
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
  • Re: Article: "The horror of XML"
    • From: "W. E. Perry" <wperry@f...>

• References:
  • Re: Article: "The horror of XML"
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Xml to HTML using XSL kinda tricky
• Next by Date: Infosets a Horror Story? ( was Re: Article:"The horror of XML")
• Previous by thread: Re: Article: "The horror of XML"
• Next by thread: Re: Article: "The horror of XML"
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread