• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: RE: Profundity du jour (was Re: What is XML F or?)
• From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>
• Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 10:44:47 -0400
• In-reply-to: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EE0DF7F8@h...>

I am profoundly ;-) sorry for attempting to send a throwaway line to
this group.  It reinforces my faith in xml-dev's ability to deconstruct
just about any nonsense until it sqeals for mercy.

Still, I like the direction it spun off into: "Identify a Bozo
who wasn't trying to be foolish but all would agree is/was a Bozo."

It's hard, partly because journalists and historians get points for
flipping the conventional wisdom on its head, and little for
exhaustively documenting the obvious.   It's also hard because
people -- Newton comes to mind -- can be remembered for their genius
while their crackpot ideas that they devoted the bulk of
their lives to are forgotten.  

• References:
  • RE: Profundity du jour (was Re: What is XML For?)
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Profundity du jour (was Re: What is XML For?)
• Next by Date: Re: Re: W3C and Linking - what is the future?
• Previous by thread: RE: Profundity du jour (was Re: What is XML For?)
• Next by thread: Re: Profundity du jour (was Re: What is XML F
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread