• To: Jeff Lowery <jlowery@s...>
• Subject: Re: OT: Save me from typing (was: XML as "passive data")
• From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@e...>
• Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 11:28:59 +0200
• Cc: xml-dev <xml-dev@l...>
• Organization: Expway
• References: <D60D8F448216D611A21A00508B62B5BC5DD1@e...>
• Reply-to: robin.berjon@e...
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.1) Gecko/20020826

Jeff Lowery wrote:
> What I object to (no pun intended) is having to write all those stinkin'
> set/get methods.  Why can't I just write:
> 
> 	private, public int foo;	// private data member, public
> accessors
> 
> Okay, Alaric: which language already does this?

Perl, true to itself, offers several ways of doing that.

-- 
Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@e...>
Research Engineer, Expway
7FC0 6F5F D864 EFB8 08CE  8E74 58E6 D5DB 4889 2488

• References:
  • OT: Save me from typing (was: XML as "passive data")
    • From: Jeff Lowery <jlowery@s...>

• Prev by Date: MS office XML
• Next by Date: Re: Since xsl:script and xsl:eval are not recommended, so is there other equavalent meahanism provided in XSL?
• Previous by thread: Re: OT: Save me from typing (was: XML as "passive data")
• Next by thread: RE: OT: Save me from typing (was: XML as "passive data")
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread