• To: "David Rosenborg" <darolst@p...>
• Subject: Re: XPath for Infoset extensions [was Annotations in XPath-NG?]
• From: Jeni Tennison <jeni@j...>
• Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2002 12:25:01 +0100
• Cc: "Uche Ogbuji" <uche.ogbuji@f...>, "Henry S. Thompson" <ht@c...>, "Eric van der Vlist" <vdv@d...>, <xml-dev@l...>
• In-reply-to: <008901c26df4$a4e39020$6500000a@KENNY>
• Organization: Jeni Tennison Consulting Ltd
• References: <E17yS6Q-0005C3-00@m...><f5b65wed6dd.fsf@e...> <005801c26de5$272f60f0$6500000a@KENNY><160931649370.20021007105345@j...><008901c26df4$a4e39020$6500000a@KENNY>
• Reply-to: Jeni Tennison <jeni@j...>

Hi David,

> However, I think that no information other than the core infoset
> should be accessible without qualified names.

Yep, I agree with that.

Cheers,

Jeni

---
Jeni Tennison
http://www.jenitennison.com/

• References:
  • Re: Annotations in XPath-NG? (Re: XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns)
    • From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...>
  • XPath for Infoset extensions [was Annotations in XPath-NG?]
    • From: ht@c... (Henry S. Thompson)
  • Re: XPath for Infoset extensions [was Annotations in XPath-NG?]
    • From: "David Rosenborg" <darolst@p...>
  • Re: XPath for Infoset extensions [was Annotations in XPath-NG?]
    • From: Jeni Tennison <jeni@j...>
  • Re: XPath for Infoset extensions [was Annotations in XPath-NG?]
    • From: "David Rosenborg" <darolst@p...>

• Prev by Date: Re: heritage (was Re: SGML on the Web)
• Next by Date: Re: heritage (was Re: SGML on the Web)
• Previous by thread: Re: XPath for Infoset extensions [was Annotations in XPath-NG?]
• Next by thread: Re: XPath for Infoset extensions [was Annotations in XPath-NG?]
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread