• To: "'Paul Prescod'" <paul@p...>, "'Bullard, Claude L \(Len\)'" <clbullar@i...>
• Subject: RE: Just Can't Get No REST
• From: Bill de hÓra <bill.dehora@p...>
• Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2002 09:45:13 +0100
• Cc: "'XML-DEV'" <xml-dev@l...>
• Importance: Normal
• In-reply-to: <3D9B460C.6050708@p...>
• Organization: Propylon
• Reply-to: <bill.dehora@p...>

> From: Paul Prescod [mailto:paul@p...] 
>
> There are a variety of reasons to dismiss Google as a discovery 
> mechanism *in some situations*. But if you are comparing to UDDI then 
> trust in the data is not a good reason. Anybody can send 
> random data to 
> a UDDI server and in general that data is not vetted. (see 
> uddi.microsoft.com). I could register as an arms dealer for 
> all the UDDI 
> engine knows or cares.

FTR: UDDI 3.0 will support digital signatures and filtering queries by
that which has been signed.


Bill de hÓra 
--
Propylon
www.propylon.com 

 

• References:
  • Re: Just Can't Get No REST
    • From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>

• Prev by Date: RE: xsd validation was RE: XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns
• Next by Date: RE: well-formed Web
• Previous by thread: Re: Just Can't Get No REST
• Next by thread: RE: Just Can't Get No REST
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread