• To: "Elliotte Rusty Harold" <elharo@m...>,"John Cowan" <jcowan@r...>
• Subject: RE: We need SAX features to say a parser supports XML
• From: "Joshua Allen" <joshuaa@m...>
• Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 07:52:18 -0700
• Cc: <xml-dev@l...>
• Thread-index: AcJ8NOUd75ryBztdQ3un5YFYOpnDIQAANdbg
• Thread-topic: We need SAX features to say a parser supports XML

> Sorry. This can't be done in an erratum. XML 1.0 says what it says.
> Parsers are designed around it. 

Since you are appealing to common practice, can you suggest *which*
parsers are designed around your example being provably true?

> It is provably true that
> <?xml version="1.1"?><root />
> is a well-formed XML 1.0 document.

• Prev by Date: Re: We need SAX features to say a parser supports XML
• Next by Date: Re: We need SAX features to say a parser supports XML
• Previous by thread: Re: Could you guys tell me any excellent XML-based site ?
• Next by thread: RE: We need SAX features to say a parser supports XML
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread