• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Perceived C/B for XML 1.1
• From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...>
• Date: 21 Oct 2002 12:49:23 +0200
• In-reply-to: <200210211050.GAA24380@m...>
• References: <200210211050.GAA24380@m...>

On Mon, 2002-10-21 at 12:37, John Cowan wrote:
> Eric van der Vlist scripsit:
> 
> > > Be liberal in what you accept, conservative in what you send.
> > 
> > Looks like a good one line summary of my long post !
> > 
> > If everyone took this advise literally, nobody would ever send XML 1.1,
> > though :=) ...
> 
> No, I assure you the Ethiopian XML Interest Group (a real organization,
> though I may not have got their name quite right) is more than eager
> to do so.

But then, they'll have derogated from being conservative in what they
send...

Eric
-- 
See you in Baltimore.
                                    http://www.xmlconference.org/xmlusa/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eric van der Vlist       http://xmlfr.org            http://dyomedea.com
(W3C) XML Schema ISBN:0-596-00252-1 http://oreilly.com/catalog/xmlschema
------------------------------------------------------------------------

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Perceived C/B for XML 1.1
    • From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>

• References:
  • Re: Perceived C/B for XML 1.1
    • From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Future of XSL-FO at W3C??
• Next by Date: Re: Perceived C/B for XML 1.1
• Previous by thread: Re: Perceived C/B for XML 1.1
• Next by thread: Re: Perceived C/B for XML 1.1
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread