• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Future of XSL-FO at W3C??
• From: Ian Tindale <iandeli@c...>
• Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2002 15:42:19 +0100
• In-reply-to: <5.1.0.14.0.20021018103237.02f780b8@p...>
• Organization: -
• References: <000001c276b0$eb436760$2001a8c0@bryans> <5.1.0.14.0.20021018103237.02f780b8@p...>
• User-agent: KMail/1.4.2

On Friday 18 October 2002 3:36 pm, G. Ken Holman wrote:
> It is an absolute requirement to have well-formed XML.

True. The parser sees to that.

-- 
Ian Tindale

• References:
  • RE: Future of XSL-FO at W3C??
    • From: "bryan" <bry@i...>
  • Re: Future of XSL-FO at W3C??
    • From: "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@C...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Future of XSL-FO at W3C??
• Next by Date: RE: The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wa rs!
• Previous by thread: Re: Future of XSL-FO at W3C??
• Next by thread: Re: Future of XSL-FO at W3C??
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread