• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: URIs and XML
• From: Miles Sabin <miles@m...>
• Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2002 15:16:49 +0100
• In-reply-to: <r01050400-1021-4A662DC7DF7C11D69C3D0003937A08C2@[192.168.124.21]>
• References: <r01050400-1021-4A662DC7DF7C11D69C3D0003937A08C2@[192.168.124.21]>

Simon St.Laurent wrote,
> One thing I find interesting is that similar issues apply to pretty
> much any URI usages in XML, from DOCTYPE declarations to stylesheet
> references to hyperlinks.  I'm not sure that namespaces rate any
> special status, but they do raise somewhat more unusual questions
> about the use of http URIs in particular.

Agreed ... see my follup to Larry's post. This issue is also not 
entirely unrelated to the "Malicious Documents" thread of a little 
while back,

  http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/200206/msg00240.html

Cheers,


Miles

• References:
  • URIs and XML
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Re: Multiple xsd:imports on the same namespace
• Next by Date: Re: [ANN] Online W3C XML Schema Validator
• Previous by thread: URIs and XML
• Next by thread: subscrible
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread