• To: "'Paul Prescod'" <paul@p...>, "'Rich Salz'" <rsalz@d...>, <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: Using RDDL as a Distributed Registry Architecture
• From: Bill de hÓra <bill.dehora@p...>
• Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2002 10:46:53 +0100
• Importance: Normal
• In-reply-to: <3DA22643.1020905@p...>
• Organization: Propylon
• Reply-to: <bill.dehora@p...>

> From: Paul Prescod [mailto:paul@p...] 
>
> Many people feel otherwise. They feel that the centralization 
> degrades 
> security because it erects a single point to attack and introduces a 
> third-party into transactions that would otherwise only involve two.
> 
> They also feel that DNS is bad because it is a *centralized* 
> directory:


One could make much the same point about Google.

Bill de hÓra 
--
Propylon
www.propylon.com 

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Using RDDL as a Distributed Registry Architecture
    • From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>

• References:
  • Re: Using RDDL as a Distributed Registry Architecture
    • From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>

• Prev by Date: <!-- -- -->
• Next by Date: RE: Using RDDL as a Distributed Registry Architecture
• Previous by thread: Re: Using RDDL as a Distributed Registry Architecture
• Next by thread: Re: Using RDDL as a Distributed Registry Architecture
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread