[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]


W. E. Perry scripsit:

> I believe that I have been consistently a stickler for well-formedness in
> XML:  my first exchange with Peter Murray-Rust on this list emphasized the
> importance I attach to well-formedness, though in that case by contrast
> with those who believed that something more than simple well-formedness
> was required for XML to be truly useful. 

Right enough, but I've never understood *why* you thought it was so important.
Your general scheme of things would work equally well if there were no
syntactic agreements at all.

-- 
A practical purist named Cowan		[that's me: jcowan@r...]
Once put the rest of us dowan.		[on xml-dev]
    "Your verse would be sweeter	http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
    If it only had metre		http://www.reutershealth.com
And rhymes that didn't force me to frowan."	[overpacked line!] --Michael Kay

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member