• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: RE: xsd validation was RE: XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns
• From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>
• Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2002 10:29:18 -0400
• In-reply-to: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EE0DF762@h...>

10/4/2002 10:20:06 AM, "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...> wrote:

>
>
>This is a silly thread.  This stuff wasn't invented 
>yesterday.

Well, I've found it quite illuminating!

Industries that can't agree on a standard paper form using
technology that has been around for 500 years are 
unlikely to agree on standardized schema using technology
that still doesn't interoperate reliably.

IMHO It's silly to argue against the proposition that 
life would be easier (for us nerds anyway) if the damned 
humans would just use the technology as it was intended.  But its
equally silly to argue for the proposition
that that this is likely to happen anytime soon.

• References:
  • RE: xsd validation was RE: XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>

• Prev by Date: RE: xsd validation was RE: XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns
• Next by Date: RE: XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns
• Previous by thread: RE: xsd validation was RE: XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns
• Next by thread: RE: RE: xsd validation was RE: XPath/XSLT 2.0 con cerns
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread