• To: Dare Obasanjo <dareo@m...>
• Subject: RE: well-formed Web
• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2002 16:49:59 -0400
• Cc: xml-dev@l..., joe@b...
• In-reply-to: <8BD7226E07DDFF49AF5EF4030ACE0B7E0696FA51@r...>

Dare writes:
> I read it. I'm not sure what you saw that is supposedly particularly
> insightful about the piece. The message seems to be "we don't need RDF
> to create a semantic web, all we need is Google and XML". I actually
> don't see what XML has to do with anything 

So the notion of a Web that makes information more accessible to
computers is just uninteresting to you?  Shared structured labeled
content considered pointless?

Oh well.  I guess the well-formed Web Joe describes is more interesting
to me than the Web Services stuff that keeps getting pushed as the
answer.

http://simonstl.com/articles/weblike.html


-------------
Simon St.Laurent - SSL is my TLA
http://simonstl.com may be my URI
http://monasticxml.org may be my ascetic URI
urn:oid:1.3.6.1.4.1.6320 is another possibility altogether

• References:
  • RE: well-formed Web
    • From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>

• Prev by Date: Type-based design patterns
• Next by Date: Re: "Datatypes" for DTDs
• Previous by thread: RE: well-formed Web
• Next by thread: RE: well-formed Web
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread