• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: RE: XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns
• From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...>
• Date: 01 Oct 2002 18:06:05 +0200
• In-reply-to: <013601c26963$82137ff0$0400a8c0@gandalf>
• References: <013601c26963$82137ff0$0400a8c0@gandalf>

On Tue, 2002-10-01 at 17:59, Aaron Skonnard wrote:

> At risk of being called naïve once again, this seems very
> counterproductive if the ultimate goal is widespread interoperability.
> If the energy and criticism poured daily into this list were directed
> towards the WGs as Jenni suggests, I wonder how things might be
> different. 

I am probably the one who will be called naive, but I won't trade truth
against productivity! I don't know if I would help the humanity but I am
sure I would loose -at least- my self esteem :-) .

Eric
-- 
Rendez-vous a Paris (Forum XML).
                          http://www.technoforum.fr/integ2002/index.html
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eric van der Vlist       http://xmlfr.org            http://dyomedea.com
(W3C) XML Schema ISBN:0-596-00252-1 http://oreilly.com/catalog/xmlschema
------------------------------------------------------------------------

• References:
  • RE: XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns
    • From: "Aaron Skonnard" <aarons@d...>

• Prev by Date: Re: limits of the generic
• Next by Date: Re: Ann: Guide to the XML Schema Specifications
• Previous by thread: RE: XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns
• Next by thread: RE: XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread