Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
At 3:01 PM +0100 10/27/02, Julian Reschke wrote: >IMHO: it can be a resource without an URI actually been assigned to it. The >essential thing is that you *could* assign that URI. OK. That makes some sense. What do you mean by the word "could"? Doie sit require that we could use existing schemes and syntaxes to assign a URI? or merely that such a scheme is conceivable? For example, in an analogous situation, would it be OK to consider a particular group of frames with particular documents in each frame a resource, even though there's not as yet any URI that can point to them? (I'm thinking pre-XFrames here.) -- +-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+ | Elliotte Rusty Harold | elharo@m... | Writer/Programmer | +-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+ | XML in a Nutshell, 2nd Edition (O'Reilly, 2002) | | http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/xian2/ | | http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN%3D0596002920/cafeaulaitA/ | +----------------------------------+---------------------------------+ | Read Cafe au Lait for Java News: http://www.cafeaulait.org/ | | Read Cafe con Leche for XML News: http://www.cafeconleche.org/ | +----------------------------------+---------------------------------+
|
