• To: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Subject: Re: heritage (was Re: SGML on the Web)
• From: Jeni Tennison <jeni@j...>
• Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2002 12:24:34 +0100
• Cc: pdurusau@e... (Patrick Durusau), xml-dev@l... (XML DEV)
• In-reply-to: <200210071106.HAA12782@m...>
• Organization: Jeni Tennison Consulting Ltd
• References: <200210071106.HAA12782@m...>
• Reply-to: Jeni Tennison <jeni@j...>

Hi John,

> And besides, LMNL is a way cooler acronym than JITT.

Oh, I dunno. We have come up with some others that are amusing though:

Toying with the idea of a schema language, it seemed obvious that LMNL
Schema Documents should have the extension .lsd.

And anyone who's subscribed to LMNL-Dev is a FOOL (Friend or Observer
Of LMNL).

All very appropriate for a language that we started working on around
the beginning of April...

Cheers,

Jeni

---
Jeni Tennison
http://www.jenitennison.com/

• References:
  • Re: heritage (was Re: SGML on the Web)
    • From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XPath for Infoset extensions [was Annotations in XPath-NG?]
• Next by Date: Re: heritage (was Re: SGML on the Web)
• Previous by thread: Re: heritage (was Re: SGML on the Web)
• Next by thread: Re: heritage (was Re: SGML on the Web)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread