[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]


At 7:58 AM -0400 10/16/02, Daniel Veillard wrote:

>done once at generation time. Apparently normalization checking is
>slightly lighter and as said that check is optional c.f. 2.13 wording.

Optional checks worry me. This just adds another point of confusion 
like the one in XML 1.0 with non-deterministic content models, where 
some parsers accept a document and some reject it. If the check is 
optional, it should further be guaranteed to be a non-fatal error, 
even when the check is made.
-- 

+-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+
| Elliotte Rusty Harold | elharo@m... | Writer/Programmer |
+-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+
|          XML in a  Nutshell, 2nd Edition (O'Reilly, 2002)          |
|              http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/xian2/              |
|  http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN%3D0596002920/cafeaulaitA/  |
+----------------------------------+---------------------------------+
|  Read Cafe au Lait for Java News:  http://www.cafeaulait.org/      |
|  Read Cafe con Leche for XML News: http://www.cafeconleche.org/    |
+----------------------------------+---------------------------------+

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member