• To: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Subject: Re: Profundity du jour (was Re: What is XML For?)
• From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 07:27:09 -0700
• Cc: Mike Champion <mc@x...>, xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <200210241309.JAA04568@m...>
• References: <200210241309.JAA04568@m...>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.2b) Gecko/20021016

John Cowan wrote:

> But not because he was a fool.  I didn't use this quote because I think
> it's off the point: the trouble is that it is hard to think of someone
> who 1) is uncontroversially a fool of the relevant kind and 2) is 
> well-known.

Pons & Fleischman?

> The fate of fools is obscurity.

Eventually. -Tim

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Profundity du jour (was Re: What is XML For?)
    • From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
  • Re: Profundity du jour (was Re: What is XML For?)
    • From: Jeni Tennison <jeni@j...>

• References:
  • Re: Profundity du jour (was Re: What is XML For?)
    • From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>

• Prev by Date: Re: DOM Level 3, more or less flexible than AS?
• Next by Date: Re: ANN: xpath1() scheme for XPointer
• Previous by thread: Re: Profundity du jour (was Re: What is XML For?)
• Next by thread: Re: Profundity du jour (was Re: What is XML For?)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread