Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
At 2:58 PM +0100 10/23/02, Alaric B. Snell wrote: >Ideally, of course, one would have a language where foo.bar = baz is just a >shorthand for foo.setBar (baz) and foo.bar is short for foo.getBar (), like >my beloved Dylan, since then you can declare fields public or public-read >private-write as you see fit and still add behaviour later. Or remove the >actual field storage altogether and replace it with a computation. > Sounds like Eiffel to me. :-)
|
