• To: simonstl@s... (Simon St.Laurent)
• Subject: Re: Slashdot on XML 1.1
• From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2002 12:33:57 -0400 (EDT)
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <r01050400-1021-D3CA3A1BE2B211D69C3D0003937A08C2@[192.168.124.21]> from "Simon St.Laurent" at Oct 18, 2002 12:01:13 PM

Simon St.Laurent scripsit:

> In case xml-dev is too quiet for you:
> http://slashdot.org/articles/02/10/18/137256.shtml?tid=99

Amazing how 1.1-Positive most of them are!

-- 
There is / One art                      John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
No more / No less                       http://www.reutershealth.com
To do / All things                      http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
With art- / Lessness                     -- Piet Hein

• References:
  • Slashdot on XML 1.1
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Future of XSL-FO at W3C??
• Next by Date: Annotation to transformation (was Re: Future of XSL-FO)
• Previous by thread: Slashdot on XML 1.1
• Next by thread: RE: The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wa rs!
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread