• To: <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: Wired News Redesign Using The Latest Web Standards
• From: "Jelks Cabaniss" <jelks@j...>
• Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 00:55:17 -0400
• Importance: Normal
• In-reply-to: <3DAB4DD9.7050305@x...>

Berend de Boer wrote:

> > Wired News: A Site for Your Eyes
> > http://www.wired.com/news/culture/0,1284,55675,00.html

> Sorry, couldn't resist:
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.wired.com%2Fnews%2Fcu
lture%2F0%2C1284%2C55675%2C00.html&charset=%28detect+automatically%29&do
ctype=Inline

> Effort failed, web doomed.

I noticed that earlier too -- after reading about the redesign in a
newsgroup and running the page through the "trust but verify" gauntlet.


Actually, it's a well-formedness problem: there's a stand-alone <p> near
the bottom.  Remove that and the page is well-formed (and valid).
Possibly something their Vignette server (the biggest tag chunks blower
on the planet) coughed up.  The second page is fine, BTW.

The Opera site has just been completely redesigned as well: XHTML 1
Strict + CSS.


/Jelks

• References:
  • Re: Wired News Redesign Using The Latest Web Standards
    • From: Berend de Boer <berend@x...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Wired News Redesign Using The Latest Web Standards
• Next by Date: Questions about XPointer Framework
• Previous by thread: Re: Wired News Redesign Using The Latest Web Standards
• Next by thread: Questions about XPointer Framework
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread