• To: "'Norman Walsh'" <ndw@n...>,<xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: Type-based design patterns
• From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@n...>
• Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2002 09:06:22 +0100
• Importance: Normal
• In-reply-to: <873croy3lk.fsf_-_@n...>
• Reply-to: <michael.h.kay@n...>

> As I think about 2 though, I'm struck that I'm going to need 
> the equivalent of "next-match" in order for it to be useful.
> 

I think you're probably right. Interestingly, "next-match" is about the
only requirement on the XSLT 2.0 requirements list that we haven't yet
tackled.

Michael Kay

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Type-based design patterns
    • From: Norman Walsh <ndw@n...>

• References:
  • Type-based design patterns
    • From: Norman Walsh <ndw@n...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns (off topic)
• Next by Date: Re: xsd validation was RE: XPath/XSLT 2.0concerns
• Previous by thread: Type-based design patterns
• Next by thread: Re: Type-based design patterns
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread