• To: vdv@d... (Eric van der Vlist)
• Subject: Re: limits of the generic
• From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2002 12:32:05 -0400 (EDT)
• Cc: uche.ogbuji@f... (Uche Ogbuji), xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <1033489047.5742.176.camel@ibook> from "Eric van der Vlist" at Oct 01, 2002 06:17:26 PM

Eric van der Vlist scripsit:

> No, it seems feasable. The only point I think we must be carefull is to
> keep -at that stage- xvif pretty minimal. I am quite happy to have done
> that amount of features with only 4 elements (if:pipe, if:transform,
> if:validate and if:apply) and I think that we must keep for the moment
> to this level of elementary features.

Otherwise we will find ourselves in the W3C Room of the Chateau d'if:.

:-)

-- 
John Cowan                              <jcowan@r...>
http://www.ccil.org/~cowan              http://www.reutershealth.com
Unified Gaelic in Cyrillic script!
        http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Celticonlang

• References:
  • Re: limits of the generic
    • From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...>

• Prev by Date: Re: limits of the generic
• Next by Date: Re: XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns
• Previous by thread: Re: limits of the generic
• Next by thread: Re: limits of the generic
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread