• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: RE: [Fwd: The problems with Xlink for integration langu ages]
• From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>
• Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2002 00:16:19 -0400
• In-reply-to: <8BD7226E07DDFF49AF5EF4030ACE0B7E07A97260@r...>

9/15/2002 12:06:09 AM, "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...> wrote:

>The main point of my post was not to assign blame but point out that there can be a lot more research by 
the W3C and communication amongst its working groups than exists today. 
>

And the main point of my reply was to point out that the research may indicate that old assumptions were 
wrong or that previous specs are inadequate, and that "communication" does not imply "agreement."  I have 
no informed opinion about XLink vs RDF vs TM vs HLink vs AF, but would suggest that the current confusion 
is due AT LEAST as much to a learning process as to a process failure.

• References:
  • RE: [Fwd: The problems with Xlink for integration langu ages]
    • From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Don't Let Architecture Astronauts Scare You
• Next by Date: RE: Don't Let Architecture Astronauts Scare You
• Previous by thread: RE: [Fwd: The problems with Xlink for integration langu ages]
• Next by thread: RE: [Fwd: The problems with Xlink for integration langu ages]
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread