[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Elliotte Rusty Harold wrote: > >Sure you can, by consuming ContentHandler instead of implementing it. > >In fact, this use of SAX is MUCH more intuitive than for reading > >documents. > > You can do a lot of things by consuming ContentHandler, but none of > that is a part of SAX. SAX is a read-only API on top of which many > applications can be built. Don't confuse the application you built > with SAX itself. Since when is SAX a "read-only API"? SAX is simply a suite of interface definitions for programmatically representing XML documents. Why does it matter what side of the interface you're on? It's still SAX. -aaron
|

Cart



